ASN recently launched KSAP in addition to its NephSAP as another self-assessment study tool. As we appreciate the effort and welcome the new product, it is concerning that KSAP is based on ABIM's "examination blueprints" and have MOC points tied to it. I have asked ASN to untie KSAP to MOC in the following email 3/2015:
"It is great to have a question bank offered by the ASN to help fellows, as well as practicing Nephrologists, for testing our knowledge. This tool was unavailable when I graduated from my fellowship. The efforts the ASN and the question writers and reviewers have put forth, is very much appreciated. However, I feel strongly that there should be no association between KSAP and MOC.
As you are no doubt aware,
there have recently been escalating controversies with MOC. In
particular,
·
Newsweek
article by Kurt Einchenwald · The BMJ blog post by Dr. Elisabeth Loder
· A debate from the National Board of Physicians and Surgeons by Dr. Teirstein
In addition, ABIM’s financial transparency has continue to be questioned. Needless to say, myself and many others believe that the ABIM and its MOC are in trouble from an ever widening credibility gap.
Therefore, I would like to
suggest a few things for ASN to consider:
1.
Conduction
of a poll on Nephrologists’ view on MOC, including each part of the MOC
program. I think this is essential and long overdue. Following the poll, the
ASN should show members the results, similar to the ACC.
I would acknowledge that other Nephrologists might have very different view
from mine, which no matter the result, would prove valuable to the ASN
leadership on this important issue.
2.
Disassociation
of KSAP from MOC. There is no evidence that MOC equates to competency or
quality of care whatsoever. Repeated “studies” conducted by ABIM board members
themselves have been unable to demonstrate benefit. KSAP is embraced because of
the content -- irrespective of MOC. Tying it to ABIM MOC forces
Nephrologists to enroll in an onerous program with dubious goals. This stance
is now shared by the Dermatology
society which has advanced a proposed resolution to stop MOC.
3.
Develop
an ASN-based certification program. ABIM may well become irrelevant
sometime in the near future, either due to upcoming investigations and/or
losing credibility and faith from physicians. Both Endocrine and Cardiology
societies have initiated discussions about alternate
certification methods. Case in point -- ASN already has developed a
strong in-training exam for fellows. It would be logical to partner with
organizations such as NBME for the next step and develop a certification examination.
Certification by this exam could be sanctioned by a new board (see below), or
ASN itself.
4.
I
have sent you the information on the new board, the
National Board of Physicians and Surgeons, and would continue to ask if it
is possible for the ASN to work with NBPAS to facilitate new certification and
MOC goals for nephrologists. "
NephTangles --
ReplyDeleteLet's keep pushing. On the other hand, let's mock MOC...
If we pronounce MOC "mock", some interesting insights emerge:
MOC -- "mock". Definitions:
The verb: to tease in a scornful manner
The adjective: not authentic
The noun: an object of derision
Pretty accurate descriptions of MOC.
But what of the Newsweek articles and ABIM? It is certainly worth a limerick:
Ode to Newsweek and the ABIM
The ABIM was a board,
historically widely adored.
Then M-O-C came,
bringing national shame,
and soon it was publically gored.
Keep poking. We can win this.